Updated integration tests for routes

This commit is contained in:
Trial97
2021-03-15 17:12:47 +02:00
committed by Dan Christian Bogos
parent c706659063
commit 88db18cc24
7 changed files with 133 additions and 104 deletions

View File

@@ -163,9 +163,10 @@ func testV1RouteGetWeightRoutes(t *testing.T) {
utils.AccountField: "1007",
utils.Destination: "+491511231234",
},
Opts: map[string]interface{}{utils.OptsRouteProfilesCount: 1},
},
}
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutes{
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_WEIGHT_1",
Sorting: utils.MetaWeight,
Count: 2,
@@ -183,8 +184,8 @@ func testV1RouteGetWeightRoutes(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutes
}}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
@@ -215,9 +216,10 @@ func testV1RouteGetLeastCostRoutes(t *testing.T) {
utils.SetupTime: time.Date(2017, 12, 1, 14, 25, 0, 0, time.UTC),
utils.Usage: "1m20s",
},
Opts: map[string]interface{}{utils.OptsRouteProfilesCount: 1},
},
}
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutes{
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_LEASTCOST_1",
Sorting: utils.MetaLC,
Count: 3,
@@ -247,8 +249,8 @@ func testV1RouteGetLeastCostRoutes(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutes
}}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
@@ -269,9 +271,10 @@ func testV1RouteGetLeastCostRoutesWithoutUsage(t *testing.T) {
utils.Destination: "1002",
utils.SetupTime: time.Date(2017, 12, 1, 14, 25, 0, 0, time.UTC),
},
Opts: map[string]interface{}{utils.OptsRouteProfilesCount: 1},
},
}
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutes{
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_LEASTCOST_1",
Sorting: utils.MetaLC,
Count: 3,
@@ -301,8 +304,8 @@ func testV1RouteGetLeastCostRoutesWithoutUsage(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutes
}}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
@@ -325,9 +328,10 @@ func testV1RouteGetLeastCostRoutesWithMaxCost(t *testing.T) {
utils.SetupTime: time.Date(2017, 12, 1, 14, 25, 0, 0, time.UTC),
utils.Usage: "1m20s",
},
Opts: map[string]interface{}{utils.OptsRouteProfilesCount: 1},
},
}
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutes{
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_LEASTCOST_1",
Sorting: utils.MetaLC,
Count: 2,
@@ -349,8 +353,8 @@ func testV1RouteGetLeastCostRoutesWithMaxCost(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutes
}}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
@@ -375,7 +379,7 @@ func testV1RouteGetLeastCostRoutesWithMaxCostNotFound(t *testing.T) {
},
},
}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutes
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil && err.Error() != utils.ErrNotFound.Error() {
t.Error(err)
@@ -396,9 +400,10 @@ func testV1RouteGetLeastCostRoutesWithMaxCost2(t *testing.T) {
utils.Usage: "10m20s",
utils.Category: "call",
},
Opts: map[string]interface{}{utils.OptsRouteProfilesCount: 1},
},
}
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutes{
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_LEASTCOST_1",
Sorting: utils.MetaLC,
Count: 2,
@@ -420,8 +425,8 @@ func testV1RouteGetLeastCostRoutesWithMaxCost2(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutes
}}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
@@ -443,9 +448,10 @@ func testV1RouteGetHighestCostRoutes(t *testing.T) {
utils.Usage: "1m20s",
"DistinctMatch": "*highest_cost",
},
Opts: map[string]interface{}{utils.OptsRouteProfilesCount: 1},
},
}
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutes{
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_HIGHESTCOST_1",
Sorting: utils.MetaHC,
Count: 3,
@@ -475,8 +481,8 @@ func testV1RouteGetHighestCostRoutes(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutes
}}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
@@ -500,7 +506,7 @@ func testV1RouteGetLeastCostRoutesErr(t *testing.T) {
},
},
}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutes
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err.Error() != utils.ErrNotFound.Error() {
t.Error(err)
@@ -656,18 +662,18 @@ func testV1RouteGetQOSRoutes(t *testing.T) {
},
}
expRouteIDs := []string{"route1", "route3", "route2"}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutes
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
} else {
rcvSupl := make([]string, len(suplsReply.Routes))
for i, supl := range suplsReply.Routes {
rcvSupl := make([]string, len(suplsReply[0].Routes))
for i, supl := range suplsReply[0].Routes {
rcvSupl[i] = supl.RouteID
}
if suplsReply.ProfileID != "ROUTE_QOS_1" {
if suplsReply[0].ProfileID != "ROUTE_QOS_1" {
t.Errorf("Expecting: ROUTE_QOS_1, received: %s",
suplsReply.ProfileID)
suplsReply[0].ProfileID)
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(rcvSupl, expRouteIDs) {
t.Errorf("Expecting: %+v, \n received: %+v",
@@ -687,18 +693,18 @@ func testV1RouteGetQOSRoutes2(t *testing.T) {
},
}
expRouteIDs := []string{"route3", "route2", "route1"}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutes
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
} else {
rcvSupl := make([]string, len(suplsReply.Routes))
for i, supl := range suplsReply.Routes {
rcvSupl := make([]string, len(suplsReply[0].Routes))
for i, supl := range suplsReply[0].Routes {
rcvSupl[i] = supl.RouteID
}
if suplsReply.ProfileID != "ROUTE_QOS_2" {
if suplsReply[0].ProfileID != "ROUTE_QOS_2" {
t.Errorf("Expecting: ROUTE_QOS_2, received: %s",
suplsReply.ProfileID)
suplsReply[0].ProfileID)
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(rcvSupl, expRouteIDs) {
t.Errorf("Expecting: %+v, \n received: %+v",
@@ -718,18 +724,18 @@ func testV1RouteGetQOSRoutes3(t *testing.T) {
},
}
expRouteIDs := []string{"route1", "route3", "route2"}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutes
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
} else {
rcvSupl := make([]string, len(suplsReply.Routes))
for i, supl := range suplsReply.Routes {
rcvSupl := make([]string, len(suplsReply[0].Routes))
for i, supl := range suplsReply[0].Routes {
rcvSupl[i] = supl.RouteID
}
if suplsReply.ProfileID != "ROUTE_QOS_3" {
if suplsReply[0].ProfileID != "ROUTE_QOS_3" {
t.Errorf("Expecting: ROUTE_QOS_3, received: %s",
suplsReply.ProfileID)
suplsReply[0].ProfileID)
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(rcvSupl, expRouteIDs) {
t.Errorf("Expecting: %+v, \n received: %+v",
@@ -749,18 +755,18 @@ func testV1RouteGetQOSRoutesFiltred(t *testing.T) {
},
}
expRouteIDs := []string{"route1", "route3"}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutes
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
} else {
rcvSupl := make([]string, len(suplsReply.Routes))
for i, supl := range suplsReply.Routes {
rcvSupl := make([]string, len(suplsReply[0].Routes))
for i, supl := range suplsReply[0].Routes {
rcvSupl[i] = supl.RouteID
}
if suplsReply.ProfileID != "ROUTE_QOS_FILTRED" {
if suplsReply[0].ProfileID != "ROUTE_QOS_FILTRED" {
t.Errorf("Expecting: ROUTE_QOS_FILTRED, received: %s",
suplsReply.ProfileID)
suplsReply[0].ProfileID)
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(rcvSupl, expRouteIDs) {
t.Errorf("Expecting: %+v, \n received: %+v",
@@ -784,18 +790,18 @@ func testV1RouteGetQOSRoutesFiltred2(t *testing.T) {
},
}
expRouteIDs := []string{"route3", "route2"}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutes
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
} else {
rcvSupl := make([]string, len(suplsReply.Routes))
for i, supl := range suplsReply.Routes {
rcvSupl := make([]string, len(suplsReply[0].Routes))
for i, supl := range suplsReply[0].Routes {
rcvSupl[i] = supl.RouteID
}
if suplsReply.ProfileID != "ROUTE_QOS_FILTRED2" {
if suplsReply[0].ProfileID != "ROUTE_QOS_FILTRED2" {
t.Errorf("Expecting: ROUTE_QOS_FILTRED2, received: %s",
suplsReply.ProfileID)
suplsReply[0].ProfileID)
}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(rcvSupl, expRouteIDs) {
t.Errorf("Expecting: %+v, \n received: %+v",
@@ -815,7 +821,7 @@ func testV1RouteGetRouteWithoutFilter(t *testing.T) {
},
},
}
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutes{
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_WEIGHT_2",
Sorting: utils.MetaWeight,
Count: 1,
@@ -827,8 +833,8 @@ func testV1RouteGetRouteWithoutFilter(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutes
}}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
@@ -1143,7 +1149,7 @@ func testV1RoutesOneRouteWithoutDestination(t *testing.T) {
},
},
}
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutes{
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_DESTINATION",
Sorting: utils.MetaLC,
Count: 1,
@@ -1157,8 +1163,8 @@ func testV1RoutesOneRouteWithoutDestination(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutes
}}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
@@ -1220,7 +1226,7 @@ func testV1RouteMultipleRouteSameID(t *testing.T) {
},
},
}
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutes{
eSpls := engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "MULTIPLE_ROUTES",
Sorting: utils.MetaLC,
Count: 1,
@@ -1234,8 +1240,8 @@ func testV1RouteMultipleRouteSameID(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutes
}}
var suplsReply engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
@@ -1258,7 +1264,7 @@ func testV1RouteMultipleRouteSameID(t *testing.T) {
},
},
}
eSpls = engine.SortedRoutes{
eSpls = engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "MULTIPLE_ROUTES",
Sorting: utils.MetaLC,
Count: 1,
@@ -1272,7 +1278,7 @@ func testV1RouteMultipleRouteSameID(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
}}
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
@@ -1356,7 +1362,7 @@ func testV1RouteAccountWithRatingPlan(t *testing.T) {
},
},
}
eSpls := &engine.SortedRoutes{
eSpls := &engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "RouteWithAccAndRP",
Sorting: utils.MetaLC,
Count: 2,
@@ -1379,9 +1385,9 @@ func testV1RouteAccountWithRatingPlan(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
}}
if *encoding == utils.MetaGOB {
eSpls.Routes = []*engine.SortedRoute{
(*eSpls)[0].Routes = []*engine.SortedRoute{
{
RouteID: "RouteWithAccAndRP",
SortingData: map[string]interface{}{
@@ -1401,7 +1407,7 @@ func testV1RouteAccountWithRatingPlan(t *testing.T) {
},
}
}
var suplsReply *engine.SortedRoutes
var suplsReply *engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &suplsReply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
@@ -1426,7 +1432,7 @@ func testV1RouteAccountWithRatingPlan(t *testing.T) {
},
},
}
eSpls = &engine.SortedRoutes{
eSpls = &engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "RouteWithAccAndRP",
Sorting: utils.MetaLC,
Count: 2,
@@ -1450,9 +1456,9 @@ func testV1RouteAccountWithRatingPlan(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
}}
if *encoding == utils.MetaGOB {
eSpls.Routes = []*engine.SortedRoute{
(*eSpls)[0].Routes = []*engine.SortedRoute{
{
RouteID: "RouteWithAccAndRP",
SortingData: map[string]interface{}{
@@ -1473,7 +1479,7 @@ func testV1RouteAccountWithRatingPlan(t *testing.T) {
},
}
}
var routeRply *engine.SortedRoutes
var routeRply *engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &routeRply); err != nil {
t.Error(err)
@@ -1498,7 +1504,7 @@ func testV1RouteAccountWithRatingPlan(t *testing.T) {
},
},
}
eSpls = &engine.SortedRoutes{
eSpls = &engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "RouteWithAccAndRP",
Sorting: utils.MetaLC,
Count: 2,
@@ -1522,9 +1528,9 @@ func testV1RouteAccountWithRatingPlan(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
}}
if *encoding == utils.MetaGOB {
eSpls.Routes = []*engine.SortedRoute{
(*eSpls)[0].Routes = []*engine.SortedRoute{
{
RouteID: "RouteWithRP",
SortingData: map[string]interface{}{
@@ -1545,7 +1551,7 @@ func testV1RouteAccountWithRatingPlan(t *testing.T) {
},
}
}
var routeRply2 *engine.SortedRoutes
var routeRply2 *engine.SortedRoutesList
if err := routeSv1Rpc.Call(utils.RouteSv1GetRoutes,
ev, &routeRply2); err != nil {
t.Error(err)

View File

@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ func testSSv1ItProcessEventAuth(t *testing.T) {
if rply.ResourceAllocation == nil || rply.ResourceAllocation["CustomerCharges"] == utils.EmptyString {
t.Errorf("Unexpected ResourceAllocation: %s", rply.ResourceAllocation)
}
eSplrs := &engine.SortedRoutes{
eSplrs := engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_ACNT_1001",
Sorting: utils.MetaWeight,
Count: 2,
@@ -213,7 +213,17 @@ func testSSv1ItProcessEventAuth(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
}, {
ProfileID: "ROUTE_WEIGHT_2",
Sorting: utils.MetaWeight,
Count: 1,
Routes: []*engine.SortedRoute{{
RouteID: "route1",
SortingData: map[string]interface{}{
"Weight": 10.0,
},
}},
}}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(eSplrs, rply.Routes[utils.MetaRaw]) {
t.Errorf("expecting: %+v,\n received: %+v", utils.ToJSON(eSplrs), utils.ToJSON(rply.Routes[utils.MetaRaw]))
}

View File

@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ func testSSv1ItAuth(t *testing.T) {
if *rply.ResourceAllocation == "" {
t.Errorf("Unexpected ResourceAllocation: %s", *rply.ResourceAllocation)
}
eSplrs := &engine.SortedRoutes{
eSplrs := engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_ACNT_1001",
Sorting: utils.MetaWeight,
Count: 2,
@@ -250,7 +250,17 @@ func testSSv1ItAuth(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
}, {
ProfileID: "ROUTE_WEIGHT_2",
Sorting: utils.MetaWeight,
Count: 1,
Routes: []*engine.SortedRoute{{
RouteID: "route1",
SortingData: map[string]interface{}{
"Weight": 10.0,
},
}},
}}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(eSplrs, rply.Routes) {
t.Errorf("expecting: %+v,\n received: %+v", utils.ToJSON(eSplrs), utils.ToJSON(rply.Routes))
}
@@ -303,6 +313,7 @@ func testSSv1ItAuthWithDigest(t *testing.T) {
utils.SetupTime: time.Date(2018, time.January, 7, 16, 60, 0, 0, time.UTC),
utils.Usage: authUsage,
},
Opts: map[string]interface{}{utils.OptsRouteProfilesCount: 1},
},
}
var rply sessions.V1AuthorizeReplyWithDigest

View File

@@ -124,8 +124,8 @@ func testDspSupPingFailover(t *testing.T) {
}
func testDspSupGetSupFailover(t *testing.T) {
var rpl *engine.SortedRoutes
eRpl1 := &engine.SortedRoutes{
var rpl engine.SortedRoutesList
eRpl1 := engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_WEIGHT_2",
Sorting: utils.MetaWeight,
Count: 1,
@@ -138,8 +138,8 @@ func testDspSupGetSupFailover(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
eRpl := &engine.SortedRoutes{
}}
eRpl := engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_ACNT_1002",
Sorting: utils.MetaLC,
Count: 2,
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ func testDspSupGetSupFailover(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
}}
args := &engine.ArgsGetRoutes{
CGREvent: &utils.CGREvent{
Tenant: "cgrates.org",
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ func testDspSupGetSupFailover(t *testing.T) {
}
func testDspSupTestAuthKey(t *testing.T) {
var rpl *engine.SortedRoutes
var rpl engine.SortedRoutesList
args := &engine.ArgsGetRoutes{
CGREvent: &utils.CGREvent{
ID: utils.UUIDSha1Prefix(),
@@ -225,8 +225,8 @@ func testDspSupTestAuthKey(t *testing.T) {
}
func testDspSupTestAuthKey2(t *testing.T) {
var rpl *engine.SortedRoutes
eRpl := &engine.SortedRoutes{
var rpl engine.SortedRoutesList
eRpl := engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_ACNT_1002",
Sorting: utils.MetaLC,
Count: 2,
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ func testDspSupTestAuthKey2(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
}}
args := &engine.ArgsGetRoutes{
CGREvent: &utils.CGREvent{
Tenant: "cgrates.org",
@@ -278,8 +278,8 @@ func testDspSupTestAuthKey2(t *testing.T) {
}
func testDspSupGetSupRoundRobin(t *testing.T) {
var rpl *engine.SortedRoutes
eRpl1 := &engine.SortedRoutes{
var rpl engine.SortedRoutesList
eRpl1 := engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_WEIGHT_2",
Sorting: utils.MetaWeight,
Count: 1,
@@ -292,8 +292,8 @@ func testDspSupGetSupRoundRobin(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
eRpl := &engine.SortedRoutes{
}}
eRpl := engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_ACNT_1002",
Sorting: utils.MetaLC,
Count: 2,
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ func testDspSupGetSupRoundRobin(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
}}
args := &engine.ArgsGetRoutes{
CGREvent: &utils.CGREvent{
Tenant: "cgrates.org",

View File

@@ -242,7 +242,8 @@ func testDspSessionAuthorize(t *testing.T) {
},
Opts: map[string]interface{}{
utils.OptsAPIKey: "ses12345",
utils.OptsAPIKey: "ses12345",
utils.OptsRouteProfilesCount: 1.,
},
},
}

View File

@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ func testSesRoutesAuthorizeEvent(t *testing.T) {
t.Fatal(err)
}
expected := sessions.V1AuthorizeReply{
Routes: &engine.SortedRoutes{
Routes: engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_LEASTCOST_1",
Sorting: "*lc",
Count: 3,
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ func testSesRoutesAuthorizeEvent(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
}}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(rply, expected) {
t.Errorf("Expected: %s, received: %s", utils.ToJSON(expected), utils.ToJSON(rply))
}
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ func testSesRoutesAuthorizeEvent(t *testing.T) {
}
expected = sessions.V1AuthorizeReply{
Routes: &engine.SortedRoutes{
Routes: engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_LEASTCOST_1",
Sorting: "*lc",
Count: 2,
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ func testSesRoutesAuthorizeEvent(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
}}
args = sessions.NewV1AuthorizeArgs(false, []string{},
false, []string{}, false, []string{}, false, false,
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ func testSesRoutesProcessMessage(t *testing.T) {
t.Fatal(err)
}
expected := sessions.V1ProcessMessageReply{
Routes: &engine.SortedRoutes{
Routes: engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_LEASTCOST_1",
Sorting: "*lc",
Count: 3,
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ func testSesRoutesProcessMessage(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
}}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(rply, expected) {
t.Errorf("Expected: %s, received: %s", utils.ToJSON(expected), utils.ToJSON(rply))
}
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ func testSesRoutesProcessMessage(t *testing.T) {
}
expected = sessions.V1ProcessMessageReply{
Routes: &engine.SortedRoutes{
Routes: engine.SortedRoutesList{{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_LEASTCOST_1",
Sorting: "*lc",
Count: 2,
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ func testSesRoutesProcessMessage(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
}
}}
args = sessions.NewV1ProcessMessageArgs(false, []string{},
false, []string{}, false, []string{}, false, false,
@@ -409,8 +409,8 @@ func testSesRoutesProcessEvent(t *testing.T) {
t.Fatal(err)
}
expected := sessions.V1ProcessEventReply{
Routes: map[string]*engine.SortedRoutes{
utils.MetaRaw: {
Routes: map[string]engine.SortedRoutesList{
utils.MetaRaw: {{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_LEASTCOST_1",
Sorting: "*lc",
Count: 3,
@@ -442,8 +442,8 @@ func testSesRoutesProcessEvent(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
},
}
},
}}
if !reflect.DeepEqual(rply, expected) {
t.Errorf("Expected: %s, received: %s", utils.ToJSON(expected), utils.ToJSON(rply))
}
@@ -465,8 +465,8 @@ func testSesRoutesProcessEvent(t *testing.T) {
}
expected = sessions.V1ProcessEventReply{
Routes: map[string]*engine.SortedRoutes{
utils.MetaRaw: {
Routes: map[string]engine.SortedRoutesList{
utils.MetaRaw: {{
ProfileID: "ROUTE_LEASTCOST_1",
Sorting: "*lc",
Count: 2,
@@ -490,8 +490,8 @@ func testSesRoutesProcessEvent(t *testing.T) {
},
},
},
},
}
},
}}
args = sessions.V1ProcessEventArgs{
Flags: []string{"*routes:*maxcost:1"},

View File

@@ -149,7 +149,8 @@ cgrates (0.11.0~dev) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
* [RegistrarC] Renamed DispatcherH to RegistrarC
* [DataDB] Added replication filtering
* [ApierS] Moved Cache field as options
* [RouteS] Updated RouteSv1.GetRoutes API to return multiple profiles
-- DanB <danb@cgrates.org> Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:25:52 +0200
cgrates (0.10.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium